Home Life Display Special Issue A gaming monitor that is in competition with speed, is it all good?

The gaming monitor market has grown in size because it improved the screen refresh rate, which has been fixed at 60 Hz for a long time.

With the introduction of products that are capable of updating screens at higher speeds, such as 120 Hz and 144 Hz, consumers have experienced smooth movements in their wallets that they could not see on conventional monitors.

Recently, a monitor supporting 165 Hz appeared to create a mood that is like a speed race, but I would like to talk a few words about it today.

It is true that the core of a gaming monitor is its speed, or Hz.

It is also true that a higher screen refresh rate means a smoother movement, so a higher Hz should be recognized as a higher quality product than a lower product.

However, high Hz does not necessarily make the movements smoother.

More Hz is meaningless if the monitor does not implement the ADE as fast as it is supported by the screen. If you connect a 120-Hz gaming monitor to a PC that is also difficult to use in the game, only mouse cursor movement and window movement will be smooth.

Therefore, to make good use of the gaming monitor, you must upgrade your PC to enable randering to fit on the straight Hz.

If upgrading a PC is difficult, it is a wise choice to focus on the higher frequency than a higher Hz monitor unconditionally. Even if you purchase products with a higher Hz, you will feel a smaller difference. I want to stop paying more for the number play.

Upgrading PC performance does not make all screens smoother. Content produced on the PC itself can be enlarged to match the playback rate of the screen, and can also be set at a certain rate, but it can not be made on a video that is already set to speed.

At least, it is necessary to fall directly to the bottom of the screen, if not 1:1, to prevent this phenomenon.

So I recommend a 120 Hz monitor rather than a 144 Hz one.

While 120Hz monitors are capable of playing low-framed, low-framed, or low-framed video, 14 .Hz monitors are capable of producing only 30p or 60p frame drops.

Of course, a 144 Hz monitor may also be less likely to be understood if the problem is addressed by changing the screen refresh rate from 120 Hz to 120 Hz, although it is a less significant area to consider.

AMD Fluid motion is a technology that creates a frame that is lacking for higher screen playback than the original image. AMD claims that using this technology not only allows for a smoother movement than the original, but also solves the problem of the other ones.

However, it is known to not be very effective on gaming monitors over 120 Hz as it was developed for 60 Hz monitors.

Even if you turn on fluid-motion, it makes little difference to those phenomena at 144 Hz. It feels better to just change the setting to 120 Hz.

It may be a psychological effect, but while it felt a little smoother with one movement active at 120 Hz, it did not seem to solve the fundamental problems with the 144 Hz monitor.


댓글 남기기

이메일은 공개되지 않습니다. 필수 입력창은 * 로 표시되어 있습니다